Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luca Giacomini vs Daniel Paty Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Giacomini vs Paty analysis and find out who is favored!
Luca Giacomini vs Daniel Paty Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Giacomini 0 - 0 Paty
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Giacomini has won 48.47% of points on their second serve, while Paty has won 56.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Giacomini, in recent form, has won 53.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paty has won 46.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.71% and 36.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Giacomini has saved 56.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paty has saved 52.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Giacomini has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 39/ 30), with Paty winning 59.57% (W/L 28/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Giacomini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 84/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 97/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Giacomini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.18% of matches (W/L 32/ 23), where as Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.57% of matches (W/L 28/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Giacomini has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.97 while Paty has played against players with an average rank of 130.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Giacomini has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paty has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Giacomini has converted 42.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paty has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
596
Rank
462
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
674
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (201-158)
Career Total W/L
54% (111-96)
45% (13-16)
YTD W/L
64% (7-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luca Giacomini | Daniel Paty |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (13/16) | 64% (7/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (27/34) | 65% (15/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (269/281) | 56% (124/98) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.59 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:28 | 1:26:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 180.9 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1182/1770) | 58% (372/639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (752/1182) | 77% (287/372) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (285/588) | 56% (150/267) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (79/188) | 40% (29/72) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (720/1763) | 41% (302/745) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 48% (11/12) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (13/29) | 64% (7/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (17/1) | 0% (4/0) |
Luca Giacomini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gregor Ramskogler
Player
Luca Giacomini
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Luca Giacomini
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Luca Giacomini
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Adam Taylor
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Luca Giacomini
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Gregor Ramskogler
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Alessandro Pecci
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Luca Giacomini
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Giacomini
Player
Michiel De Krom
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Szymon Kielan
Player
Daniel Paty
44%
(
54 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
5
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
57%
(
40 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
48 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Jasza Szajrych
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Mariano Tammaro
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Matthias Ujvary
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tobias Smoliner
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Giacomini Vs Paty Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Giacomini are available here and Paty photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
